Pfizer Says Their Covid Shot has 39% Efficacy. The Minimum Required for an EUA is 50%. Will FDA Ignore Efficacy Rules?
Ben Swann: The Biggest Problem with the Covid Vaccines
None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, intensive care use, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus. Tal Zaks, Chief Medical Officer at Moderna told BMJ that "Hospital admissions and deaths from covid-19 are simply too uncommon in the population being studied for an effective vaccine to demonstrate statistically significant differences in a trial of 30 000 people. The same is true of its ability to save lives or prevent transmission: the trials are not designed to find out. To dermine these endpoints, we would need a trial that is 5-10x larger, or 5-10x longer, neither of which is acceptable to the public [in this emergency]"
Toby Rogers: “This is the most unethical medical experiment since the Inquisition. One cannot overstate how unethical it is to skip animal trials (or even run them concurrently). Animal trials give you the toxicokinetics -- they tell you where in the body the injected substances go (brain? kidneys? bone?), what impact the injected substances have on the affected organs (lesions? cancer? necrosis?), and how long the injected substances stay in the body. You can *only* find that information by sacrificing and dissecting animals. If you skip that step, we will not know the toxicokinetics in humans until your autopsy (and by then it will be too late). This is completely unethical and a violation of all human subjects research protection protocols.
“And it is a crime against humanity to wipe out the control group (as Moderna and Pfizer have done) just a few months into an experimental gene therapy trial. In a situation like this, with a new and novel substance that has never worked in humans, the control group should be monitored for years or even a lifetime. So whatever is happening here, it is a grotesque violation of long-established essential scientific processes.”
Michelle Malkin Reports the Bombshell Revelations from British Medical Journal on the Limitations of Safety and Efficacy Testing When the Entire Process is Rushed Due to the "Emergency"
“There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic… You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.” Dr. Mike Yeadon PhD, Pfizer’s former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory Disease
“What we know about coronavirus from 30 years of experience is that a coronavirus vaccine has a unique peculiarity, which is any attempt at making the vaccine has resulted in the creation of a class of antibodies that actually make vaccinated people sicker when they ultimately suffer exposure to the wild virus.”Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
The Covid-19 Vaccine; Is the Goal Immunity or Depopulation?
by Mike Whitney, The Unz Review
Here’s what I think is currently going on in our country and across much of the western world. A public health crisis– that was manufactured and gamed-out before the initial outbreak in Wuhan, China –has been used to short-circuit long-held civil liberties, strengthen the authority of political leaders, collapse the economy, dramatically remake basic social relations, and impose absolute control over work, school, gatherings and recreational activities. Public policy is now set by unelected technocrats who operate behind the cover of lofty-sounding organizations that are entirely controlled by the world’s biggest corporations and richest oligarchs. President Dwight Eisenhower anticipated this troubling scenario 70 years ago when he said:
“Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”
Bingo. This is the state of affairs in America today. All real power has been conceded to a globalist oligarchy that operates behind the curtain of corrupt government officials and public health experts. This begs the question of whether the hoopla surrounding the Coronavirus emerged as a spontaneous and appropriate reaction to a lethal and fast-spreading pandemic or whether the hysteria has been greatly exaggerated (Infection Fatality Rate is 0.26% or 1 in 400) to implement a transformational political-social agenda that will not only eradicate democracy and basic human rights, but also pave the way for dangerous vaccines that will dramatically curtail population growth, which is an objective that is widely shared among wealthy elites.
Would it surprise you to know that vaccines have been used in Africa, the Philippines, Nicaragua and Mexico to terminate fertility?
Australia Halts COVID-19 Vaccine Development Due to HIV Positives
The Australian Government has scrapped a billion dollar coronavirus vaccine agreement with Australian biotech company CSL Limited to supply 51 million doses of a Covid-19 vaccine being developed by the University of Queensland after several trial participants returned false positive HIV test results.
What’s interesting is that this story is claiming the HIV tests are “false positives.” But if HIV is actually detected, then how is it false?
Notice that when someone is found to be carrying the coronavirus, it’s never called a false positive. It’s simply called a “positive” result or a new “case” of infection. By that logic, these vaccine recipients should also be labeled “cases” of HIV.
And it begs the question: What’s being put into the vaccine that resembles HIV closely enough to trigger a positive test result?
HIV protein fragments intentionally added to coronavirus vaccines
Mr Petrovsky told The Australian the problem with the use of HIV was clear in the ‘hamster and mouse data’ but his advice was ignored. He said the early data suggested the vaccine itself was quite unstable.
Covid’s spike proteins, like most surface viral proteins, are fairly unstable. To ensure that the vaccine induced the right immune response, the clamp chosen comprises two fragments of a protein found in HIV, as those fragments provided the greatest stability to the vaccine.
So wait, they’re usingHIV componentsin the vaccine on purpose? Indeed, yes.
And this is why it’s triggering the HIV “positive” test results. In other words, they aren’t false positives at all. They’re detecting the HIV components that are being deliberately put into the coronavirus vaccine.
Study Involving Nearly 10 Million Chinese Found No Asymptomatic Spread. Not One Case.
On June 7, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, told a press conference that from the known research, asymptomatic spread was “very rare.” “From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.” She added for emphasis: “It’s very rare.”
There was an understandable explosion of fury on all sides. People against lockdowns were screaming all over Twitter that if this is true, the rationale for the lockdowns mostly disappears. We can go back to our normal lives. We can open up everything again!
Iwroteat the time:
What this suggests, of course, is that there is nothing mysteriously magical or insidious about this new virus. It behaves like the viruses that scientists have been studying for one hundred years. What we do with a normal virus is be careful around others when we have symptoms. We don’t cough and sneeze on people and generally stay home if we are sick. That’s how it’s always been. You don’t need lockdown to achieve that; you just proceed with life as normal, treating the sick and otherwise not disrupting life.
If that is the case with this one, everything we’ve done over the months – the mask wearing, the grasshopper dance not to be next to people, the canceling of everything, the wild paranoia and premodern confusions – has been a calamitous and destructive waste of time, energy, and money.
On the other side, there was the predictably pro-lockdown mainstream media which decried her heresy. The cry was so loud that the WHO immediately startedwalking backthe claim, mostly with hints and suggestions that didn’t say untrue things but did not repudiate the initial claim either: “There is much to be answered on this. There is much that is unknown. It’s clear that both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals are part of the transmission cycle. The question is what is the relative contribution of each group to the overall number of cases.”
Following that, the question seemed to fade. We went back to assuming that potentially everyone had a disease, enabling fellow citizens to become virtuous enforcers of mask wearing, staying home, and separating, screaming and yelling at others for failing to comply. The science on the question was unsettled, we were told, so let us go back to wrecking life as we once knew it. More
Is the Covid Nasal Test Swab Depositing Something That Will be Absorbed into the Brain? See this:
Intranasal Drug Delivery Bypasses the Blood-Brain Barrier
Neurology Reviews. 2016 April;24(4):1, 40-41
LAS VEGAS—The nasal mucosa in the upper third of the nasal cavity provides a direct pathway from the external environment to the brain and, according to William H. Frey II, PhD, that pathway can be used to noninvasively deliver therapeutics into the brain. This pathway effectively bypasses the blood–brain barrier and avoids the systemic exposure and side effects associated with therapeutics that enter the bloodstream. At the 19th Annual Meeting of the North American Neuromodulation Society, Dr. Frey presented an in-depth look at intranasal delivery of therapeutics to the brain.
William H. Frey II, PhD
“We have learned from experience that therapeutics sprayed into the nose or even given as nose drops can travel extracellularly and paracellularly along the olfactory axon bundles and along the trigeminal nerve pathway from the nose to the brain,” said Dr. Frey, who is Founder and Codirector of the Alzheimer’s Research Center at Regions Hospital and Senior Director of HealthPartners Neuroscience Research in St. Paul.
This technique is being investigated in various disorders. “Most of the studies have been done in animal models, but the Alzheimer’s work has also been done in humans,” Dr. Frey said.
The Neuroanatomy of Intranasal Delivery
The cribriform plate of the skull separates the upper part of the nasal cavity from the brain. The primary olfactory nerves are located in the roof of the nasal cavity under the cribriform plate and include the olfactory sensory neurons and odorant receptors. Sniffing brings molecules into the nose, thus allowing them to bind to odorant receptors and send a signal. Intranasal delivery of therapeutics involves spraying therapeutics into the upper part of the nasal cavity to enable them to follow these olfactory axon bundles directly into the brain through foramena in the cribriform plate. Once across the cribriform plate, the therapeutics penetrate the subarachnoid space and enter the perivascular spaces of the brain’s blood vessels.
When the heart pumps, a corresponding pulsation in the cerebrovasculature creates a perivascular pumping mechanism that moves the therapeutics throughout the brain. “They are near the blood vessels, but on the brain side of the blood–brain barrier throughout the brain,” Dr. Frey explained. Drugs also follow the trigeminal nerves that innervate the entire nasal mucosa and follow the trigeminal neural pathway through the trigeminal ganglion and into the brain and upper spinal cord.
“[This method] results in rapid delivery—within 10 minutes in mice, rats, and monkeys—to the brain and upper spinal cord,” Dr. Frey said. In humans, intranasal neuropeptides reach the CSF within 10 minutes.
Source: MDedge.com
CDC Expands Contraindication List for CoVID-19 Vaccinations
Anyone with a history of immediate allergic reaction of any severity to any component of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines or to polysorbate should not be vaccinated, the CDC said in updated interim guidance.
While previously the agency released guidelines for contraindication to vaccination, it's now broadened to include those with a history of immediate allergic reaction to a previous dose of or any component of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, including polyethylene glycol.
In addition, people developing severe allergic reactions such as anaphylaxis after a first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine should not receive a second dose.
All ingredients in the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines were listed by CDC in an "interim clinical considerations" document posted on the agency's website Polysorbate is not a vaccine ingredient but was included because people sensitive to it may also react to polyethylene glycol.
People with allergy histories involving these substances should be considered for allergist/immunologist referral to determine if they can receive the vaccine, the agency said in a call with clinicians.
"This guidance is being updated primarily because starting in a few days, people who got their first dose will be eligible to receive a second dose and we thought providers needed more guidance," said the CDC's Sarah Mbaeyi, MD, on the call. "We are continuously reevaluating our guidelines to make sure they are based on the best available information, so providers had more information available when people started coming in for their second dose of vaccines."
CDC guidance defined an "immediate allergic reaction" as any hypersensitivity-related signs or symptoms such as urticaria, angioedema, respiratory distress such as wheezing, or anaphylaxis that occur within four hours following exposure.
But it is important to distinguish allergic reactions from other symptoms, such as vasovagal symptoms or vaccine side effects. Mbaeyi noted about 90% of people with anaphylaxis present with skin findings, "which can be helpful in distinguishing allergic reactions from other reactions."
She added that most immediate allergic reactions occur within 15-30 minutes of vaccination, whereas vaccine side effects, such as fever, chills or fatigue, occur a median of 1-3 days following vaccination.
Those with immediate allergic reaction to any vaccine or injectable therapy not related to a COVID vaccine component or polysorbate requires a balance of the risks and benefits of vaccination. Mbaeyi said in those cases, vaccination may be deferred and the individual may wish to consult with an allergist-immunologist.
Risks may include risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2, risk of severe disease or death, an unknown risk of anaphylaxis and the ability of the patient to be vaccinated where appropriate medical care is immediately available for anaphylaxis.
However, as before, history of allergic reactions not related to vaccines, injectable therapies or components of mRNA vaccines -- such as food, pet dander, or latex -- is not a contraindication to vaccination, Mbaeyi said.
Those with a precaution to vaccination or history of anaphylaxis due to any cause should be observed for 30 minutes following vaccination, and all other persons should be observed for 15 minutes afterwards.
Tom Shimabukuro, MD, also of the CDC, said that cases of anaphylaxis following COVID-19 vaccination had received outsized media attention. "These are still very rare events," he said.
"PCR positive is no longer = Covid. You are not Covid now unless you get a second test to confirm it, and are presenting clinical symptoms." ~The Ethical Skeptic"
Anyone who knows how the PCR test works, knows that all you'd have to do to dramatically lower the case numbers they're finding is simply to lower the threshold of the number of cycles of amplification that they use to determine a positive result.
I.e. If you allow labs to use very high cycle thresholds (above 32 CT) and claim all those positive tests as "Covid cases", you'll have a tidal wave of positives that are not true positives. (Not actual live infections). That's exactly what's been going on for the last year.
Countless virologists and epidemiologists have been calling out this pseudoscience for nearly a YEAR now. They've been calling out the nonsense of diagnosing COVID based on PCR tests, and explaining how PCR tests with cycle thresholds above 32 is EXTREMELY unscientific and is therefore massively inflating the numbers of cases.
That is, they've been calling for the lowering of the cycle threshold of the test, and for only SYMPTOMATIC people to be labeled as being a COVID case.
All the while, we had people scoffing at these criticisms and insulting those people pointing out these flaws, calling them "conspiracy theorists" for daring to "question the science."
Now, as soon as the vaccine is rolled out, and Trump is out of office, guess what *coincidentally* now is happening?
As "luck" would have it, the WHO is now changing their guidelines of what constitutes a COVID case!
What are they changing it to? Exactly what many people (including me) have been saying all along -- lowering the cycle threshold, re-test a second time, and confirm with symptoms.
Hooray! Now they're finally following this simple, common sense stuff that should've been happening all along. (The very things those crazy "conspiracy theorists" were calling for them to do).
This WOULD actually be great news, if it were done 6 or 8 months ago, as it should have been.
But now, it will do nothing except serve to obfuscate the truth even more. Now cases will drop dramatically in the coming months as a result of these simple changes in the testing requirements for being labeled a COVID case.
And the narrative will be spun that the reason COVID cases are declining so dramatically is because of lockdowns, Biden's mask mandates, and vaccines. The world will then celebrate lockdowns, masks, and vaccines as the reason why cases are dropping so dramatically. (When in reality, it's largely the simple result of slightly altering the PCR testing criteria for being called a "COVID case.")
ABSOLUTELY UNBELIEVABLE.
Unless you believe this is all purely coincidence that they're changing the COVID case criteria in this specific way at THIS specific point in time, then you're a "conspiracy theorist." You don't want to be called that, do you? So you'd better believe the timing of all this is just a big coincidence!
Trust the narrative. Keep ignoring all the overtly shady pseudoscience. Otherwise, you're a crazy conspiracy theorist.”
*Recombinant, replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus vector encoding the SARS CoV 2 Spike (S) glycoprotein. Produced in genetically modified human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells.
More on mRNA vaccines by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna Covid-19 vaccination has been a big topic and we were curious on the role of excipients in such formulations. Not surprisingly both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna (source FDA) have quite similar compositions: Active Ingredient, Lipids and a saline solution. Lipid (oil) “bubbles” are tiny bubbles of lipid (oil) surround and protect the mRNA so cells in your body can pick it up both vaccines have Cholesterol as part of the composition. The Saline (salt) solutions are also different. Pfizer-BioNTech uses a common type of saline called phosphate buffer solution, or PBS. Moderna uses a tris buffer which aims to make the pH level of the vaccine close to that of our bodies. (Kerry McGee, MD – goodRx.com)
13 Questions to Ask Before Considering an mRNA Shot
Following the science, if I take the experimental biologic offered by Pfizer or Moderna:
1.- Can I stop wearing the mask? NO
2.- Can they reopen restaurants etc and everyone work normally? NO
3.- Will I be resistant to COVID? UNKNOWN. Maybe, but we don't know exactly, it probably won't stop you getting it.
4.- At least I won't be contagious to others anymore? NO...you can still pass it on, possibly, nobody knows.
5.- If we vaccinate all children, will school resume normally? NO
6.- Will I be able to stop social distancing? NO
7.- Will l be able to stop disinfecting my hands? NO
8.- Will me and my grandfather hug each other? NO
9.- Will all regular public forums be reopened? NO
10.- Can we gather with family & Church? NO
11.- So, what is the real benefit of vaccination? UNKNOWN
12.- Are you sure the vaccine won't kill me? CRICKETS
13.- If l have a 99.7% chance of defeating the virus with my immune system, but the vaccine only offers 95% protection, from apparently NOTHING, why would I get vaccinated? To protect others...from what? You told me that l am not protected. CRICKETS
14.- So if I get vaccinated, the others are 100% sure I'm not infecting them? NO
15. If I am injured are the companies liable for any damages? NO...the manufacturers have a liability protection clause.
So the shot does not give immunity.
Does not eliminate the virus.
Does not prevent death.
Does not guarantee you won’t get it.
Does not prevent you from getting it.
Does not stop you passing it on
Does not eliminate the need for travel bans.
Does not eliminate the need for business closures.
Does not eliminate the need for lockdowns.
Does not eliminate the need for masking.
So who is getting rich?.....CRICKETS.
SO WHAT IS THE POINT?
CDC Lying About Vaccine Efficacy in People Who Already Had Covid-19
Today we begin with an investigation regarding the Covid-19 vaccine shortages. There are serious questions about an incorrect claim made by top scientists at CDC: the nation’s premiere public health institute. Critics call it misinformation. CDC chalks it up to an “honest mistake." Whatever it is, it resulted in vaccines going to some who are said to need it the least depriving others who are said to need it the most.
Like a lot of Americans, Congressman Thomas Massie already had coronavirus and wanted to know if he should still get a Covid vaccine.
Most everyone who’s had Covid-19 is considered immune. But how long immunity lasts is unknown—whether it’s after infection or vaccination.
An award-winning scientist himself, Massie quickly found that vaccine studies showed no benefit to people who’ve had coronavirus. Vaccination didn’t change their odds of getting reinfected.
The controversy began when Massie noticed the CDC was claiming the exact opposite.
CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices had just issued a high profile report authored by 15 scientists. It wrongly claimed Pfizer’s study proved the vaccine is highly effective or showed “Consistent high efficacy” for people who’d already had coronavirus—“SARS-CoV-2.”
Rep. Thomas Massie: It says the exact opposite of what the data says. They're giving people the impression that this vaccine will save your life, omr save you from suffering, even if you've already had the virus and recovered, which has not been demonstrated in either the Pfizer or the Moderna trial.
The mystery deepened when Massie contacted CDC for an explanation. Massie says he was so alarmed by the misinformation, he decided to record the calls.
On a December 16th call, CDC’s Captain Amanda Cohn seemed to agree that people who’ve had coronavirus shouldn’t rush to get vaccinated.
Infections in the Vaccinated Outpacing Infections in the Unvaccinated in 5 Countries
Most Infections in Israel are Among Vaccinated People
In Israel, about 60 percent of the country’s population of 9.3 million has received at least one dose of a COVID vaccine. About 85 percent of adults in Israel have been vaccinated. Yet most of the new coronavirus infections are occurring in vaccinated people.5
In early-July, former Health Minister Chezy Levy, MD confirmed that “55 percent of the newly infected [people in Israel] had been vaccinated.”6
There has also been a concerning rise in the number of vaccinated people in Israel being hospitalized. An article in The Jerusalem Post last week noted that the Israeli Health Ministry reported 124 people had been hospitalized for COVID-19 on July 20 and that 65 percent of them were fully vaccinated. Of the 124 people, 62 were in serious condition and 70% of those patients were fully vaccinated.7
Most Infections in Chile, Seychelles and Mongolia are Among Vaccinated People
Another example of a highly vaccinated country which has been experiencing a new outbreak of coronavirus infections mostly among its vaccinated population is Chile. Of the thousands of new coronavirus cases being reported daily in that country, 80 percent of them are in vaccinated people. Chile has fully vaccinated 55 percent of its population.10
Infections in Vaccinated People in U.K. Outpacing Infections in the Unvaccinated
A recent study published by King’s College in London, which operates the ZOE COVID Study app to monitor COVID infection and vaccination rates, found that, as of July 15, 2021, there was an average of 15,537 new daily symptomatic cases of COVID-19 among partly or fully vaccinated people in the United Kingdom—an increase of 40 percent from the previous week’s total of 11,084 new cases.12
The Zoe COVID Study, led by epidemiologist Tim Spector, MD, of Kings College in London, estimated that there were 17,581 new daily symptomatic cases of COVID-19 in unvaccinated people, or 22 percent less than the previous week’s total of 22,638 new cases. According to a press release issued by the study’s authors, “With cases in the vaccinated group continuing to rise, the number of new cases in the vaccinated population is set to overtake the unvaccinated in the coming days.”12
Luc Montagnier, MD: Variants are Produced by Vaccination
In a May 2021 interview with Pierre Barnérias of Hold-Up Media, French virologist and Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier, MD said he believed that the mass vaccination programs for COVID may be causing SARS-CoV-2 mutations like the Delta variant and, thus, prolonging the pandemic.11
Dr. Montagnier explained that in each country that undertakes a mass vaccination campaign, “the curve of vaccinations is followed by the curve of deaths.” He said that the COVID vaccines create antibodies that force the virus to “find another solution” or “die,” adding that it is the variants that “are a production and result from the vaccination.”11
Public Health England: Vaccine Efficacy is Negative in Under-50s
Fatality Rate in the Vaccinated Under-50s is 57% Greater Than in the Unvaccinated
Up to August 2nd there were 13 deaths from 25,536 cases in the double vaccinated, giving a CFR of 0.05%, and 48 deaths from 147,612 cases in the unvaccinated, giving a CFR of 0.03%. Strikingly, the CFR in the vaccinated here is higher than in the unvaccinated. In fact, it is 57% higher, meaning the vaccine effectiveness is negative 57%, i.e., in the under-50s the vaccine increasesthe risk of death once infected by 57%.
Israeli Study: The Fully Vaccinated are 13X MORE LIKELY to Catch Covid-19 and at “Greater Risk of Hospitalization” than Those Who Recovered with Natural Immunity
August 27, 2021: A new study out of Israel has confirmed that individuals who have natural immunity have better protection against the DELTA VARIANT than people who are fully vaccinated. The team of researchers, from Maccabi Healthcare and Tel Aviv University, published their study earlier this week to medRxiv.org.
‘This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant‘
The researchers conducted an extensive study on 800,000 individuals that were broken into 3 groups. People who had received either one or two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine were compared with unvaccinated individuals who have natural immunity, because they had already recovered from the virus.
MOST NOTABLY, the study also found – Three months after a 2nd dose, the risk of contracting Covid was 13.06 times higher among the vaccinated and they are 27 TIMES more likely to experience symptoms.
According to these highly credible researchers who conducted a massive study on hundreds of thousands of people, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine won’t just make people more likely to catch new variants – they will also be more affected by symptoms and more likely to end up hospitalized.
This latest data just adds to amounting pileof evidence that demonstrates the experimental jab’s low efficacy when it comes to stopping the spread of the virus. Even before this most recent study, some researchers had already found that the vaccinated spread the virus as much, if not more, than the unvaxxed.
The FDA skipped out on necessary trials and rubber-stamped their experimental jab anyway.
Antibody Dependent Enhancement, Pathogenic Priming, and Viral Drift
This is a paradoxical reaction to [vaccination]. It has happened in response to injections for RSV in the 60's, Dengue in 2018 in the Phillippines, and in all animal trials for corona virus pre-2020.
In essence, the antibodies the body makes can either neutralize the virus, making it unable to replicate (neutralizing antibodies) or bind the virus as a signal to the t-cells to come clean up (binding antibodies). When the t-cell eats the virus and neutralizing antibody up it clears the body. But when it takes the virus with binding antibody up, the virus is still active and uses the t-cell infrastructure to replicate itself. So the cells meant to clean the virus out of the body become the cells making the virus. This turns the immune system against itself and causes a huge cytokine storm (massive inflammation.) In all cases it makes you sicker than you would have been without the injection. Worst case scenario it causes mutliple organ/system failure and death.
It's especially likely in the case of variants. Which brings us to Viral Drift... More
